You Only Need to Ask One Question to Assess Team Skills

Team skills are a core attribute of success; unfortunately most interviewers assess them on factors that do not predict team skills.

Using the Performance-based Hiring process I recommend, you only need to ask two types of questions to determine if a person is a great fit for your open job. The Most Important Interview Question of All Time is the first of the two. It involves digging into the person’s major accomplishments and assessing the trend of the person’s performance over time.

A modification of this same question can be used to accurately assess team skills. To get a sense of how revealing this technique is, answer the following question about one of your team accomplishments.

Can you describe your most significant team accomplishment, either where you led a team or were part of an important team project?

Regardless of your initial response, I’m going to follow up with these additional fact-finding questions. Review them slowly and think about how you’d answer them regarding the same team accomplishment.

Use Team Fact-finding Questions to Clarify the Person's Role

  • Describe who was on the team including titles and your exact role.
  • How did you get on the team? If you were chosen, why were you chosen? If you volunteered, why did you volunteer?
  • Did you have a chance to build the team, and, if so, how?
  • What were the team objectives and how did you help shape them?
  • Was a plan put together? What was your role in this?
  • Was the plan successful? How did you help make it successful?
  • Who was the most difficult person to deal with on the team? How did you deal with the person and did you influence the person in any way?
  • Give me examples of how you influenced those on the team who didn’t report to you.
  • Give me examples of how you influenced those who were in a different function or who were more senior than you.
  • What were the three or four things you did to help the team achieve its objectives?
  • Where did you proactively help others on the team meet their objectives or become better? (Get 2-3 examples of this for this one accomplishment.)
  • Did the team achieve its objectives?
  • Did the team receive any formal recognition?
  • Did you receive any personal recognition for your role on this team?
  • How did your team skills improve or change as a result of this team accomplishment?

Repeat the Same Questioning Process Two More Times

Now imagine I ask you this same question with similar fact-finding follow-up questions for at least two different team accomplishments. The purpose of this approach is to obtain detailed insight into three different team accomplishments, including your most current position, for the past 3-5 years (possibly longer, if appropriate). With this information, here’s what I’d learn about your team skills:

  • The growth and importance of the teams you were assigned to and if your role was expanding or not
  • If you were assigned to important multi-functional teams, and, if you were, why and how
  • Who you influenced outside of your department, their organizational function and level, how you convinced them, and if this ability was growing or not
  • If you proactively helped others and how you helped them
  • Your ability to deal with conflict
  • The growth of your team influence over time and if it expanded in scope or was static
  • How others perceived your team skills by either asking for your support or assigning you to important teams
  • The success of the teams, your role in helping them achieve success, and if you were personally recognized for the success in any way
  • Your ability to work with and influence people in different functions and different levels, both inside and outside the company
  • If your team skills were still growing or had reached a plateau

Using this approach, consider how much information an interviewer would have about your team skills unattributed to whether you make a good first impression or not, whether you’re introverted or extroverted, or whether you were a bit nervous or not.

Team skills are a core attribute of success; unfortunately most interviewers assess them on factors that do not predict team skills. I’ve met quiet techies who were assigned to cross-functional product marketing teams who had outstanding team skills. I’ve also met polished sales types who were never assigned to any important teams. Finding people who have a track record of being consistently assigned to important cross-functional teams is how you measure team skills.

Properly assessing candidates for team skills should be a critical focus of every interview. All it takes is one question asked three times.

____________________

Lou Adler (@LouA) is the CEO of The Adler Group, a consulting and training firm helping companies implement Performance-based Hiring. He's also a regular columnist for Inc. Magazine and BusinessInsider. His latest book, The Essential Guide for Hiring & Getting Hired (Workbench, 2013), provides hands-on advice for job-seekers, hiring managers and recruiters on how to find the best job and hire the best people. You can continue the conversation on LinkedIn's Essential Guide for Hiring Discussion Group.

Charles M Cawley

Director at Buttercross Property Ltd

9y

The trick is not to interrogate but to engage. We've lost sight of this due to an obsession with behaviorism that expressly says engagement is unprofessional, subjective and amateur. (See B.F. Skinner on his view of objectivity on Wikki, or Bernays on 'engineered compliance'). The process will let you discover the nature of someone's humor. We all know humor varies, depending on occupation: a funeral business has a very different humor to, say, advertising agencies or warehousing etc:. In some controlling occupations, such as teaching, H.R. and police, humor seems in short supply. There is even a humor comparison test to go with this. If you can't laugh with your peers, you won't suit the team. If you share a sense of humor, have about the same competence and will to get things done you will, as they say, 'fit in'. The trick is not interrogate or try to be some cod scientist collecting behaviorist predictive data, but to engage with candidates as equal human beings. It is shocking that something so obvious has to be said.

Jon McCarty

Commercial Intelligence | Strategic and Financial Oversight | Tech-Innovator | I help subsea businesses grow profitable revenue |-|-|

9y

I see no light at the end of the tunnel. Lou, very trendy and expect a lot of HR managers would love to use this to weed out pretty much anyone they interviewed. I don't mind the bated headline so much and your questions no doubt work with Oracle consultants or Programme managers for bank systems or insurance systems. But not every system works for every business. And, no, I don't have a better one!

Like
Reply
Julie Kowalski

Coach, Mentor, and Transformational Sherpa helping leaders change the story about what's possible for their career, people, and company.

9y

Golly, I count a lot more than one question there! Seriously, the first question gets you in the ballpark, but without that list of follow up questions, you'll likely only get an initial fluff ball (because, in my experience, most people start off with a generic response). I am not trying to be contentious here, simply to point out that while the "one question" points us in the right direction, the follow up questions us the real "meat". If we try to over simplify, or if we are satisfied by the high level response, we won't get the same data on which to make a decision. So if you're an interviewer here, especially a newer interviewer, please make use of that great list of follow up questions. And if you're a job seeker, you'll probably want to do the same thing. A candidate who is well prepared to answer that list of follow up questions can impress a poor interviewer (in my experience, MOST interviewers are not all that effective) by providing important details around his or her accomplishments even if they are not requested. The interviewer may not realize why, but in the end, find that for some reason, the detailed, behavioral responses stand out as having more credibility. Thanks for the article. I really loved the list of follow up questions, and the encouragement to take that journey three times rather than just once. That takes a lot of discipline, though its always value added. I might even take it one step farther and suggest that the three questions get broken up across multiple interviews. This way you can explore different responses.

Charlie Galland, QWLP

Commercial Staffing Professional | Strategic Sales | Operations

9y

Totally agree Kathryn Mujezinovic

To view or add a comment, sign in

Insights from the community

Explore topics